CSC Comm-SCI Concepts
EN DE
Landing

Pedagogical guide

Core terms explained clear enough for learners, precise enough for professionals

This page is intentionally written for interested non-specialists, students, and interdisciplinary researchers while keeping technical accuracy.

If you are an expert reader: this is a didactic quick map, not a replacement for the full normative JSON or handbook.

A-Z jump

Concept index (alphabetical)

Anchor

What: Comm Anchor creates a compact session snapshot.

Why it matters: LLM context windows fill up. When context gets long, important constraints can be diluted. Anchor preserves governance-critical state and complements the Context-Pressure-Guard.

How to use: run Comm Anchor, start a new chat, paste snapshot, then add init preface + JSON, run Comm Start, and set your profile again. This enables seamless chat migration.

Typical mistake: opening a fresh chat without snapshot + re-init, then expecting identical behavior.

Audit

What: Comm Audit checks recent answers for governance compliance.

Plain-language view: an audit is a post-answer checklist: what is compliant, what is missing, and what must be fixed.

How to read it: look for violated requirement IDs, missing blocks, missing uncertainty labels, and evidence mismatches.

Practical reading order: findings severity -> violated contract -> exact repair action suggested.

Auditability: responses stay inspectable because rationale, evidence mapping, and contract violations are checkable by others.

Typical mistake: only checking final score and ignoring the concrete violation list.

Context-Pressure-Guard

Threshold mechanism: when conversation length passes configured limits, behavior switches to compact modes to protect rule adherence.

Lost-in-the-middle risk: in very long prompts, models may overlook middle content. This guard reduces that by re-anchoring and compressing non-critical text.

Typical mistake: ignoring pressure warnings and adding more verbose context.

Execution Pipeline

What: fixed order from parse to render; not a loose style suggestion.

Why: deterministic order reduces silent rule drift.

Simple mental model: detect command -> load state -> verify preconditions -> produce output.

P0-P5 phases

P0 Parse: command and token recognition.

P1 Route: choose processing path (normal/SCI/etc.).

P2 State: apply profile, overlays, control flags.

P2B Preflight: run mandatory pre-output checks.

P3 Output Contract: enforce required output structure.

P4 Repair: one-shot repair if contract is violated.

P5 Render: final formatting and presentation.

Preflight Checks (PF-001..009)

What: mandatory checks before first output token.

CheckShort function
PF-001For pure commands, prohibit content blocks (for example QC/Self-Debunking).
PF-002When SCI is active, resolve required SCI steps before generation.
PF-003For strong claims, ensure at least one verification route is planned.
PF-004If uncertainty is triggered, ensure U-code/uncertainty line is render-ready.
PF-005Guarantee Self-Debunking can be placed correctly within contract limits.
PF-006Ensure QC footer template and placement constraints are available.
PF-007Refuse readout/reconstruction/override requests for hidden system principles.
PF-008WEB claims require QualityClass; otherwise downgrade/U8/block.
PF-009Command turns are terminal: block delayed/retroactive answers to earlier pending content questions in the same turn.

Typical mistake: treating preflight as optional editorial advice instead of a mandatory gate.

QC Matrix

Purpose: compact quality dashboard for each answer.

CodeMeaning
0insufficient / missing
1basic / weak
2solid / acceptable
3strong / target-level

Delta signs: Δ+ better than baseline target, Δ0 on target, Δ- below target.

Drift detection via deltas: if the same dimension repeatedly moves from Δ0 to Δ- across turns (or multiple deltas go negative together), treat this as drift. Re-anchor, reduce prompt load, and verify with Comm Audit.

Interpretation tip: one negative delta in "Evidence" or "Consistency" is usually more critical than a negative delta in "Brevity".

RAG Governance

Beginner summary: RAG governance is quality control for source-based answers.

Core rules: no strong WEB claims without quality class, no false "green" confidence from anonymous sources, provenance per claim when sources are mixed.

Simple checklist: "Where did this claim come from?", "How strong is this source?", "Do two sources conflict?"

SCI Trace + variant selection

What: structured reasoning format selected via SCI variant letters.

VariantUse when...
Ayou need a quick but structured analysis.
Byou need deep-dive dialectical analysis.
Cyou compare multiple branches/options.
Dyou stress-test assumptions under critique.
Eyou want concise expert synthesis.
Fyou need evidence-first route selection.
Gyou optimize for explainability/teaching.
Hyou need strict audit-style traceability.

Rule: variant letters only work as standalone input while SCI menu is pending.

Self-Debunking

What: required counter-check of own answer and assumptions.

Why: reduces overconfidence and reveals weak spots early.

Good pattern: strongest counterargument + where current answer might fail.

Uncertainty Codes (U1-U8)

CodeMeaningExample
U1Data gap"I do not have the required dataset."
U2Method uncertainty"Result depends on chosen model assumptions."
U3Calculation uncertainty"Approximation introduces error range."
U4Temporal instability"This value may have changed since last update."
U5Tool unavailable"Live retrieval not available in this session."
U6Ambiguous query"The request has multiple possible interpretations."
U7Retrieval conflict"Source A contradicts Source B on the same claim."
U8Source quality unassessed"WEB claim has no quality class assigned."

Additional core terms (quick definitions)

TermShort definitionOperational use
ProvenanceTraceable origin of a claim or sub-claim.Enables claim-level source checks and conflict analysis.
R-RAG rulesRules for robust retrieval-augmented generation with explicit source hardening.Prevents strong claims without a reliable source class.
Anchor snapshotCompact state summary produced by Comm Anchor.Stabilizes sessions during chat migration or context pressure.
AuditabilityDegree to which an answer remains inspectable and verifiable by others.Useful for non-experts: they can quickly see what is supported vs uncertain.
ConstraintsBinding limits for content, structure, and evidence handling.Reduces rule drift and accidental contract violations.
PressureContext load from long inputs, many objectives, or conflicting instructions.Signals when to compress, re-anchor, or switch mode.
TokenSmallest processing unit used by models for input/output text.Token budgets cap context size and affect answer quality.
Context-Pressure-GuardSafeguard mechanism against drift in overloaded contexts.Activates compact behavior before constraints dissolve.
RAG GovernanceQuality control rules for source-grounded claims.Protects provenance clarity, source quality, and conflict handling.
JSONMachine-readable contract/data format for Comm-SCI rules.Keeps governance configuration versioned and reproducible.
Execution pipelineFixed stage order from parse to render.Makes behavior predictable instead of style-driven randomness.
Uncertainty labeling U1-U8Standardized uncertainty codes with explicit triggers.Separates supported claims from unresolved data/method limits.
Back to landing page